[Ben Holmes]

(09-12-2016, 01:29 AM)Nick Principe Wrote:  Patrick, it is astounding to me your level of persistent denial, that you are shown images of 18 separate witnesses all pointing to the same place, and that your response is to completely ignore every one of them...or perhaps on your least laziest day lump them all in as "mistaken." Which they would have to be, of course; either they're ALL mistaken, or your theory faces a huge problem.

And what PROVES Patrick Collin's dishonesty - is the fact that he will NOT publicly admit that the Autopsy Report's placement of this wound is COMPLETELY CONSISTENT with these witnesses who showed on film where they saw the wound.

David Von Pein is the same... he resolutely refused to admit this.

Why are believers so dishonest???
 

(09-12-2016, 01:29 AM)Nick Principe Wrote:  And you've never, at least to my recollection, addressed the lead snowstorm image.

He can't.

It's scientific HARD EVIDENCE for a shot from the front. He claims an education level that would make it impossible for him not to understand the implications of the larger fragments being in the back of the skull.
 

(09-12-2016, 01:29 AM)Nick Principe Wrote:  Not that anyone would expect you to; even your explanation of the Kilduff image is preposterous, to trivialize pointing to his temple as "just a gesture" due to his right-handedness.
 

(09-11-2016, 05:09 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Mac Kilduff pointed to his own temple when he stated it was a head bullet wound, but that was clearly just a gesture. Had he been left handed he would probably have pointed to hsi left temple.

As a lefty myself, I regard your above comment as a real "pearler."

As I recall, both Patrick Collins and Henry Sienzant lied about where Kilduff said he got the information.

I wonder if Patrick is honest enough now to publicly state where Kilduff got his information about the shot to the head... (My crystal ball says no...)