[Patrick C]

Ben Holmes Wrote:

(09-17-2016, 12:10 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  However there is no doubt that a rifle was seen pointing out of the 6th floor SE corner window as it was seen by at least 5 and possibly 6 people as I recall and it was seen as the sound of shots was heard.

It is possible that IF Moorman did take an earlier picture that she did so when the assassin was not visible - or for example was indescernable given the rather poor quality of the camera and film.

This is a silly hypothesis... it offers no explanatory power to the question of why it was covered up. If it showed nothing, then there was NO REASON WHATSOEVER that it wouldn't be retained as evidence. Not showing an assassin simply means it was taken seconds before or seconds after he was at the window.

It did not venture an argument as to cover up IF the picture actually existed.

Can  you not understand plain English!

---

Ben Holmes Wrote:Only by labeling the witnesses as liars or morons.

I did not state Moorman was a moron nor any other witness.

I actually met Mary Moorman twice in Dallas in the 80s and found her to be a very pleasent lady so I would never describe her as you suggest.

Do you get pleasure from just making stuff up Holmes....or do you just deliberately lie?