[Ben Holmes]

Henry Sienzant Wrote:I can provide solid evidence for the person I understand all the evidence points to as the mastermind of the assassination - Lee Harvey Oswald. I can show you his weapon. I can show you his order for the weapon. I can show you how he paid for the weapon. I can show you how he possessed the weapon. I can show you how his weapon was determined to be missing from its normal hiding place in the Paine garage shortly after the assassination. I can show you how numerous eyewitnesses outside the building saw a shooter or weapon on one of the upper floors of the Depository during the assassination. I can show you how his weapon was discovered on the sixth floor of the Depository shortly after the assassination. I can show you how the ballistics evidence implicates his weapon in the assassination - how three shells, two large fragments, and one nearly whole bullet found at Parkland implicate Oswald directly in the assassination. (Original post found here.)

Of course, when challenged to provide this very evidence, believers run.

Nothing they can provide would stand up in court against critical attack.

As just one example, the Money Order allegedly used to pay for the rifle had NO BANK ENDORSEMENTS WHATSOEVER... and thus never traveled through the banking system.

I would enjoy it if someone were to dare try to post the evidence that they think indicts a sole shooter in this case, or that they think indicts Oswald.

The contrary evidence is unexplained.

Indeed, the fact that the NAA testing of his cheek cast exonerates Oswald has never been explained, only denied.