[Ben Holmes]

Henry Sienzant Wrote:I already exposed in previous posts how Mark Lane took advantage of his readership by denying them the full context of many issues he raised. Rather than repeat all those here (you can find them easily enough), I'll ask you to defend this one sentence here, "It is the right to have facts, not hopes or thoughts or wishes or prejudicial opinions, presented", by telling us one fact you believe Mark Lane presented honestly in his book, RUSH TO JUDGMENT. Just tell us one claim pointing to conspiracy that Lane presented honestly, and be willing to defend it. (Original post found here.)

That's strange!?

I've twice posted nearly the entire book, 'Rush To Judgment' - in small paragraph chunks, over 400 posts in total - and the responses I received dealt with 2 or 3 of them.

Indicating that believers are unable to even phrase an argument about the vast majority of 'Rush to Judgment'... yet the frequent claims, as above; are that believers can easily answer Mark Lane, and can easily point to "dishonesty" in his book.

Why are believers afraid to actually do what they claim they can do?
 

WHY AREN'T THEY POSTING THIS ALLEGED "DISHONESTY" FOR ALL TO SEE?

Dead silence...