[Patrick C]

Anyone with any knowledge of the case and common sense knows that the wound covered three bones according to the autopsy report.

The Dallas doctors placed the wound further back by memory causing the silly wound alteration or cover up theory to arise.

What Baden is saying is that the major part of the wound was pariatel. He cannot disagree with the wound extending to the occipital bone as that is stated in the medical report. He is concerned with the extent to which it did that.

Ben Holmes Wrote:WAS DR. BADEN CORRECT WHEN HE STATED THAT: "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said."?

You stated

Ben Holmes Wrote:Patrick, for example; claiming that Dr. Baden was correct when he stated that the wound was not in the Parietal-Occipital... This is a tactic that David Von Pein is guilty of as well...

Well I must have been high as kite then or you are misrepresenting what I stated.

No, unless he qualified that it was also temporal. Though technically you could argue that as the wound was parietal-occipital and temporal it was not only parietal-occipital.

The argument is tedious and merely semantic and a complete waste of time.

That you are chasing your tale on this non subject Ben just tells us what a time waster you are. 

Don't expect any further comments from me on this point - I am not interested in it. Pip Pip.