[Ben Holmes]

(09-26-2016, 05:00 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(09-26-2016, 04:11 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(09-26-2016, 04:03 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  To suggest Hank and DVP don't know the evidence is frankly ludicrous. Of course they do.

Oh, I can vaguely see how you might have taken what I said that way, since you didn't pay attention... but the truth is, they cannot post here because they cannot use ad hominem.

Here's my precise wording: "This is the reason that others, such as Henry Sienzant, David Von Pein, or Dale refuse to post here, they can't call everyone names... they have to deal with the evidence."

Now tell us Patrick, why couldn't you have answered what I actually said?

(09-26-2016, 04:03 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Patrick has not been "shut down" by the evidence. He has just been bored senseless by the tedium here.....!

And yet, the truth is, you've rather consistently lied about the evidence, and you've been caught every time you do so. (I don't believe I've missed any of your lies...)

You've not retracted even a single lie I've pointed out.

Why is that, Patrick?

(09-26-2016, 04:03 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  I would also suggest that it is indeed conspiracy believers who tend to be poorly informed or mis-informed.....no wonder such is their reputation.

You'd know far better than most that such would not apply to me... don't you Patrick?

(09-26-2016, 04:03 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  You for example claim that there could have been 5 or more shooters - based on wyward speculation....and that is being polite.

You've been caught lying about what I've stated... and you've CONSISTENTLY REFUSED to quote my actual words... why is that, Patrick?

Why do you refuse to support your lies?

I do not lie. I decided to virtually stop posting here a couple of weeks ago because you are incapable of debating the subject without calling a person a liar if they disagree with you.

It is also boring. I am used to a high standard of debate and really have no interest in exchanging views with someone who demonstrates ignorance and rudeness on a consistant basis.

Enjoy your time posting to yourself on this tedious forum.

You're lying again, Patrick.

I predicted that you'd refuse to cite any evidence or support for your lies, and indeed, this is exactly what happened.

I don't label people who "disagree" with me "liars," Patrick; I label those who tell provable lies ...

I've made that point repeatedly.

You CANNOT provide an example of a mere "disagreement" as being labeled a lie by me...

You have my permission to continue your cowardly running, Patrick...