[Ben Holmes]

(10-29-2016, 11:30 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:If they HAVE been rebutted, simply 'cut & paste' the rebuttal.

Read any decent pro lone gunman book....eg 

David Belin
Peter Knight
Mike Majerus
Mel Ayton

DVP's web site.

I am not going to go digging to satisfy your request - it won't make any difference anyway.

By the way Anthony Summers believes the bullet passed through both men.....a very sensible conclusion because the SBT is by far the most likely theory for the non fatal wounds of JFK (presumably) and JC.

We know that as no other rifle or ammo was found, that it is almost a certainty that the MC was the weapon that fired that shot and that the odds of a short shot are remote (about 1 in 2000), so then the bullet struck JFK at approx 2100 ft per second and as it did not strike bone it would almost to a certainty, exit. Why would it not....?

The bullet then either has to strike the car or Connally - who is seated slightly below and inward of JFK. As no whole bulllet was found in the car, almost to a certainty, the bullet must have struck Connally.

The Single Bullet Fact........it is really quite simple.

It's truly amusing that critics can post the evidence, and believers absolutely refuse to do so.

Nor will you defend ANY of those sources should I quote and refute them. (as I'm doing right now with Bugliosi's rather silly 53 reasons)

Tell us Patrick, why the cowardice?

Why are you afraid to post something tangible that I can actually respond to?