[Ben Holmes]

(10-15-2016, 02:34 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:He was either "persuasive" - or he spouted nonsense.

What a ridiculous suggestion.

So you think he spouted 1600 pages of nonsense over a period of 20+ years of research and writing......as a succesful attorney with a fine track record........

He wrote one of the most emphatic books ever written on the assassination. Period. He does not need any defending and if he were here to debate with you Holmes, he would run rings around you.

Such AMAZING cowardice!!!

You again avoided all the points I raised.

So let's deal with the one minor point you thought you could argue.

You claim Bugliosi doesn't need any defending... the truth is, YOU CAN'T DEFEND BUGLIOSI!!!

For example, that 20+ years of study ... and he STILL couldn't get the basic descriptions of the wounds correct. Something that David Von Pein was able to do after only a week of attempting to refute my point that Bugliosi lied.

Something I predict that you'll NEVER publicly admit...

Bugliosi lied about the "ragged" throat wound, and you know it.

You claim he needs no defense... YOU'RE A LIAR, PATRICK - he most certainly does need a defense against the very credible assertion that he lied.