[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:Any test that was not conducted under the correct conditions is meaningless.

Depends what you mean by "correct". I would suggest that the CBS tests were highly persuasive that Oswald's alleged 3 shots in under 6 seconds was doable.

And yet, you continue to run from explaining why the CBS test did what the Warren Commission's test could not.

Patrick C Wrote:As long as the speed is correct and the height is reasonably accurate (plus or minus a few feet matters not) I disagree with your statement.

Yet you can't explain the differences in the tests... The CBS test provably used a more credible testing method, and despite the many advantages that the Warren Commission test had over the CBS test - the WC test still couldn't get the job done.

Until you can give a credible explanation for this fact, you've lost.

No wonder you keep hyping the CBS test...

Patrick C Wrote:To recreate the exact same conditions would be impossible and indeed not required.

Why don't you list the conditions of an honest test. Keep in mind, however, that you'll be showing your basic honesty...