[Ben Holmes]

(10-16-2016, 07:53 PM)Lee Abbott Wrote:  Patrick was accused of the crime by Bugliosi but managed to get himself cleared........ dishonestly, of course!

Yes... Bugliosi accused Patrick of not reading the newspaper... and was therefore guilty of murder...

Oops... that's a preview of #9... which won't be posted until later this week...

Of course, on a more serious note... it's not only Patrick who cannot defend Bugliosi on these silly 53 reasons... it's every single believer online who's read my refutations... (Which is, of course, a large percentage of all believers online who post...)

Patrick is certainly knowledgeable enough to defend Bugliosi on these claims of his... if it were possible to do so.

But Patrick has has a very difficult start on the first three... and will increasingly fail as we go through all of them.

Many of these "reasons" have no logical credibility to them... such as not reading a newspaper is evidence that one is guilty of murder... just the silliest sort of nonsense that critics have learned to expect from believers.