[Ben Holmes]

(12-12-2016, 05:15 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  You state "Quite the gutless liar, aren't you Patrick? Quite the coward too... willing to make a claim, yet completely unwilling to allow anyone to answer it."

Once again here we go. Holmes just take a running jump.

How can I not allow some one to answer a claim on YOUR web site you idiot.

Okay... let's pretend just for the sake of argument that YOU are someone else.

Let's hear you answer the charge that you made that my "logic is appalling, your English comprehension is appalling."

In other words, pretend to be me, or someone defending me... You can ONLY use the facts listed... you cannot point to any particular statement that is "appalling" - because there's no quoted or cited statements.

Go ahead and answer the claim.
 

I DEFY YOU TO DO SO!!!

You can't, of course... because the coward that made the charge refused to specify what was appalling or incomprehensible. Thus making the claim unanswerable...

And your refusal to demonstrate that the claim could be debated will demonstrate that my charge of cowardice is truly merited.

I predict it in advance...

 

(12-12-2016, 05:15 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  The fact that you constantly accuse me of lying and running just shows you to be an inedequate juvenile. You are incapable of adult debate.

I've often noted the drop in grammar & spelling when a believer is getting mad...

It's not logical that correctly pointing out a lie somehow reflects on the person pointing it out.

I can understand why you're getting mad at being pointed out time and time again as a liar and a coward. It's simply symptomatic of believers... the more they understand and learn about the evidence, the more they lie and demostrate cowardice.

Who knows, apart from the JFK case, you might actually be a good character... 

But don't pretend honesty when you cannot even cite or quote for your assertions...

 

(12-12-2016, 05:15 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  I have dipped in for a few minutes each week and in this last instance have answered your question fairly and naturally honestly. 

What is honest about your refusal to treat believers in the same fashion as you would critics?

What is honest about making claims you refuse to cite the evidence for?

What is honest about claiming that your assertion can be answered, WHEN YOU WILL REFUSE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT IT CAN BE?

You keep claiming an "honesty" that you simply don't have. Such as the recent time you claimed to have answered THE ONLY QUESTION RAISED - then later realized just what the question actually was...

Or the time you claimed that a majority of witnesses documented in the first two days pointed to the TSBD... a blatant lie on your part... and one that you still refuse to retract or cite the evidence for...

Honest!???

I can only laugh at your claim!!!

 

(12-12-2016, 05:15 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Some of your posts I have not addressed because I am simply not interested nor willing to take any more time - and why should I? You are a disgrace.

Anyway, take your running jump Holmes enjoy playing JFK assassination Patience.

Continue to run, coward... I'll be happy to point out the facts that you can't address. I will continue to rebut the silly claims that Bugliosi made about Oswald's guilt.

He may very well be guilty, but the evidence simply isn't there... as I continue to point out.