Posts: 955
Threads:276
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
35
Stance Critic
Re: Did Mark Lane Lie Concerning Helen Markham?
R. Anderson Wrote:lol Like I've always said about you people: you don't even recognize dishonesty when you see it. He didn't ask for immunity over some taping issue......he specifically was concerned over the issue of perjury.
You're lying again, Anderson.
I quoted Mark Lane's testimony, he was quite specific, and NOWHERE does he even slightly imply any issue of perjury... not even a WHISPER.
Mark Lane makes it ABUNDANTLY clear that his issue was lawyer-client privilege - and all believers can do is keep lying about it.
Why does the truth need a lie?
Quote even a
SINGLE WORD that implied Mark Lane was "
concerned over the issue of perjury."
But no-one will... certainly not Anderson...