[Ben Holmes]

Rather than waiting for an entire month to point out that Patrick has refused to answer a post, (when Patrick will then claim that I'm wrong)... I'll make the charge right now...

Since Patrick has provably seen the above post, and clearly has refused thus far to answer it.

This is quite typical... critics can answer ANYTHING AT ALL that believers raise - and do so in a credible manner with, in most cases, corroborating evidence.

The opposite isn't true.

Time and time again I raise issues that believers simply cannot answer.

Then whine that they don't answer it because of my attitude... (The truth, of course, is quite a bit different... and provably so.)

If Bugliosi's 53 reasons for Oswald's guilt were actually strong evidence in reality... Patrick would be all over my rebuttals... and would be making mincemeat of my posts.

Clearly, that isn't happening.

And that fact tells the tale...