[Ben Holmes]

David Von Pein Wrote:

(12-21-2016, 03:07 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

Boz Wrote:Though Oswald was probably more politically oriented than all thirteen other warehousemen at the Book Depository Building put together, if we are to believe Oswald’s story, he apparently was the only one who had no interest at all in watching the presidential motorcade go by, either from out on the street or froma window, claiming in one version that he was having lunch on the first floor of the Book Depository Building at the time of the shooting, and in another version that he was working on the sixth floor. Indeed, Oswald, the political animal, was so uninterested in the fact that the most powerful politician on earth had just been shot that he had no inclination to stick around for a few minutes and engage in conversation with his coworkers about the sensational and tragic event. Does that make any sense? 

V Bugliosi Reclaiming History       

Interestingly, although this post already has over half a dozen responses, and these include alleged critics, not a single person has pointed out Bugliosi's lie.

IT'S A LIE that Oswald ever stated that he was on the 6th floor during the shooting. There's no citation given, and none available.

So if you want the truth, alt.assassination.jfk, a censored forum run by "Professor" John McAdams, probably isn't the place you want to go...

Ben Holmes, as usual, is wrong. A source most certainly is "available" for Bugliosi's quote. And two sources *are* provided by Mr. Bugliosi for that information, with both sources being traced back to Harry Holmes.

Does Ben Holmes *really* think Vince Bugliosi just MADE UP the stuff quoted by BOZ in post #1 of this thread? The source just wasn't provided by BOZ in this aaj thread. That's all.

Once again, no citation.

Believers clearly believe that all that's needed is an assertion. And since vague assertions cannot be definitively refuted, this explains David's cowardice...