[Patrick C]

"Neither is it based on conjecture."

Perry did not have the means nor time to determine if the anterior neck wound was an entry. He made what was effectively an educated guess which he later regretted. You have seen his TV interviews.

The wound could have been either entry or exit or words to that effect.

"Only by the wildest of imagination can the opinions of medical doctors on a medical issue be labeled "conjecture"."

Ref Perry in Trauma 1, I totally disagree.


"Indeed! Why would anyone make up the fact that the earliest opinion based totally and only on what the doctors saw was mere "conjecture?"....."

The doctors did not examine the entry wound to determine the precise nature of the wound ref shot direction. Perry is on record as stating he never thought about obliterating an existing wound - he just did the trach as required.

"Dr. Humes, Dr. Boswell, and Dr. Finck would not agree with you on the location of the large head wound. So what?"

Sorry you are talking double Dutch there, I have no clue what you mean. I accept that the head wound is where the autopsy report puts it over which there is no disagreement. Bullet entry yes - that seems to be less clear.