#1
Conspiracy JFK Forum
Single Bullet "Fact?"
Single Bullet "Fact?"
'Vincent Bugliosi Wrote:"With respect to the second shot fired in Dealey Plaza, the "single-bullet THEORY" is an obvious misnomer. Though in its incipient stages it was but a theory, the indisputable evidence is that it is now a proven FACT, a wholly supported conclusion. .... And no sensible mind that is also informed can plausibly make the case that the bullet that struck President Kennedy in the upper right part of his back did not go on to hit Governor Connally." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Pages 489-490 of "Reclaiming History"
If the SBT is a "Fact" - why is it that no believer dares to try to defend it against a knowledgeable critic?
It's a FACT that the prosectors could not trace ANY PATH AT ALL through the body.
It's a FACT that this theory didn't even come into existence until Tague forced a revision of the "Three shots, three hits" theory.
It's a FACT that without the SBT, conspiracy is the only other explanation... one that explains other facts as well...
Why aren't their any believers brave enough to dispute these facts?
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)