[Ben Holmes]

(02-08-2017, 04:19 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(02-08-2017, 03:41 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(02-08-2017, 01:29 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  The SBT is so obviously the historical truth it should be known as the SBF as I have stated many times.

And yet, you can't seem to defend that assertion... why is that, Patrick?

Oh, I can absolutely defend that assertion Holmes, using the very same data that others have used - including Dale Myers and David Belin, Posner and Bug and defenders such as DVP and John McAdams....no point in reinventing the wheel.

Bullet enters back at 2000ft per second will exit.
Short shot chance = approx 1 in 5,000
Bullet wound in anterior neck - clearly an exit as no bullet found in the torso of JFK
No bullet in car other than head shot pieces 567 and 569
JC seated below and inward & in front of JFK is struck by a bullet in the armpit area.
Angles add up
Wounds add up

Simple. The SBF.

You can't defend against the evidence by using speculation.

Most of what you just spouted is speculation.

I'm still waiting for you to quote or cite these "ass kickings" you claim I've taken...

Why are you such a coward, Patrick? You keep making claims you can't support.

Quote one of these "ass kickings," or have the honesty to retract your lie.