[Ben Holmes]

(02-13-2017, 02:04 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(01-28-2017, 03:53 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(01-28-2017, 02:14 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  "When someone not only can't determine that Oswald killed Kennedy, but spends all their time concocting ways to try to undermine that firm ground it becomes apparent very quickly that they are only playing silly games."

Very well said.

Ben is a prime example of some one playing silly games with his up to 5 shooters 7 shots scenario........

I keep asking myself where are all the seeing eye dogs in the Plaza are given the number of shots that missed not only the presidential party, but the huge limo itself.

This is quite funny coming from someone who believes that 33% of the shots fired missed.

Actually, it simply illustrates the hypocrisy of believers... 

Nor did all that many shots miss... You still believe that all the wounds were caused by just two bullets. My scenario HAS LESS BULLETS MISSING as a percentage of those fired than what you believe. So those "seeing eye dogs" were all believers, weren't they?

Tell us Patrick, why couldn't you answer my rebuttal to this statement? Cowardice or ignorance? Or perhaps there's another reason that you'll give?

I believe either 3 shots were fired and 1 shot missed or that only two shots were fired and both hit.

Last time I heard you thought there could be 7 shots.......now with 3 or 4 strikes that is still more than 33%......

Unless you go for 5 hits out of 7, but of course that is a ridiculous scenario.

The "ridiculous" scenario is supported by the evidence... you know, you KNOW that medical testimony showed that Connally could have been struck three times by three separate bullets.

You lost.