[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:

(05-09-2017, 06:35 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  And there will be very little if not anything at all that will support your views in the Oct 2017 releases.

I'm sure that's your prayer every night. But historically, each time there's been new releases of information, it's not gone well for your faith.

I am an atheist Ben, I don't pray.

Perhaps you don't "pray" in the Biblical sense - but there's no doubt in my mind that believers are worried about what might be released in Oct. 2017.

There's NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that your faith would have been better served had the Warren Commission not released the 26 volumes, the Clark Panel never met, the HSCA and ARRB never met...

The more evidence that's been released, the tougher it's been to remain true to the party line.

 

(05-09-2017, 06:35 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Have you ever responded to an "adversary" in a non combatitive way...?

It seems you simply want to argue over the JFK case and criticise...your motive is surely not the historical truth, but the way you want it to be.

If my motive were NOT historical truth, what explains the fact that there's no question on the JFK evidence I'm not willing and able to address - and precisely the opposite is true for believers?
 

(05-09-2017, 06:35 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Oswald fired two shots and killed JFK, he may have missed with an early shot. Simple.

Pip Pip.

The evidence fails to show this. (Which clearly shows why you're afraid of the evidence...)