#50
Conspiracy JFK Forum
LN Factoids
Re: LN Factoids
I misunderstood Patrick's comment about the winding mechanism, because I missed the post where he wrote this:
"He may have said he was worried about running out of "power" from the winding mechanism.....I will check with Mike Majerus."
Apologies, Patrick. That statement is much less hilarious, although Ben's reply to my previous post makes your statement kind of impossible.
It is amusing that you LNers constantly accuse critics of just making stuff up, and then you do the same thing yourself. In other words, you might have read this somewhere and simply taken it for true rather than checking. Now at this late date you claim to not even remember where you picked up these nuggets. A few minutes searching the internet would be advisable before making such assertions. You have time enough to make all these posts, so you have time enough to do a little searching.
The question now is, will you admit you were wrong about both things, or will you attempt to get out of it somehow?
Mr. ZAPRUDER - Well, they claimed they told me it was about 2 frames fast--instead of 16 it was 18 frames and they told me it was about 2 frames fast in the speed and they told me that the time between the 2 rapid shots, as I understand, that was determined--the length of time it took to the second one and that they were very fast and they claim it has proven it could be done by 1 man. You know there was indication there were two?
Mr. LIEBELER - Your films were extremely helpful to the work of the Commission, Mr. Zapruder.
pufflogo2.gif (Size: 12.61 KB / Downloads: 166)
"He may have said he was worried about running out of "power" from the winding mechanism.....I will check with Mike Majerus."
Apologies, Patrick. That statement is much less hilarious, although Ben's reply to my previous post makes your statement kind of impossible.
It is amusing that you LNers constantly accuse critics of just making stuff up, and then you do the same thing yourself. In other words, you might have read this somewhere and simply taken it for true rather than checking. Now at this late date you claim to not even remember where you picked up these nuggets. A few minutes searching the internet would be advisable before making such assertions. You have time enough to make all these posts, so you have time enough to do a little searching.
The question now is, will you admit you were wrong about both things, or will you attempt to get out of it somehow?
Mr. ZAPRUDER - Well, they claimed they told me it was about 2 frames fast--instead of 16 it was 18 frames and they told me it was about 2 frames fast in the speed and they told me that the time between the 2 rapid shots, as I understand, that was determined--the length of time it took to the second one and that they were very fast and they claim it has proven it could be done by 1 man. You know there was indication there were two?
Mr. LIEBELER - Your films were extremely helpful to the work of the Commission, Mr. Zapruder.
pufflogo2.gif (Size: 12.61 KB / Downloads: 166)
| Messages In This Thread |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)