[Nick Principe]

Patrick C Wrote:Clearly all the witnesses you have quoted there were wrong unless there was a missed shot that was never found.

You just called 11 corroborating statements "mistaken." Sorry, but that's not good enough. And as I'm sure you're aware, there were far more witnesses who heard this rapid "bang-bang" than were cited. Eleven is merely a sample.

Patrick C Wrote:And excuse me, I object to being called a Zealot. I have NO agenda on the assassination. I am and always have been open to a conspiracy.

Not a single forum member here or on Amazon has ever seen any evidence to support this statement.

Patrick C Wrote:My opinions on this subject are based partly on extensive academic research and some professional work on the case for highly reputable organisations. And unlike I expect most of you guys here (though I cannot be certain) have met and spoken with many dozens of people who were connected to the case be they witnesses or law enforcement or other.

Whether this is true or not is debatable, but giving you the benefit of the doubt here, you have also just described Mark Lane to a tee, and there is scarce a LNer alive who affords Mr. Lane any credibility whatsoever. Since his findings are the exact opposite of yours, tell us how your CV makes any difference in these matters.