[Ben Holmes]

Dale Hayes Wrote:

Kevin Draiss Wrote:Ben lies........2 entrance wounds, and no exit......." I don't know why this is a problem." HAHAHAHAHAHA! You funny man!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA! This is too easy!!!

20 Forensic experts (Independent experts) agree with Kevin and disagree with Ben.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the Autopsy did not dissect, and DID NOT KNOW about the bullet wound in JFK's throat.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the bullet wound LOOKED like an entry.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the prosectors were ORDERED not to dissect the track of the bullet.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" even knew that the HSCA had intentionally lied about the testimony of the Bethesda witnesses - indeed, THEY NEVER HEARD THAT TESTIMONY. The HSCA kept the very evidence needed by the "experts" to make an honest appraisal.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the Parkland staff CHANGED their "opinion" AFTER that weekend...

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the ONLY medically trained personnel to examine, however briefly, the bullet wound in JFK's throat were at Parkland.

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that "ragged" holds no place in the description of the original bullet wound in the skin of JFK's throat. (Contrary to the lie told by Vincent Bugliosi)

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that they've never seen the photograph showing bruising of the apical portion of the lung. (Unless Dr. Baden is one of these anonymous forensic experts - in which case we have one who lied about having seen it.)

Not a SINGLE ONE of those 20 anonymous "Forensic experts" would disagree that the executive session of the Warren Commission on Jan. 27 mentioned an autopsy report in which the throat wound was described as being caused by a fragment of bone.

You can't cite even ONE of these anonymous "experts" contradicting anything I've stated in this post - nor will you even try. (This prediction held true...)

Such AMAZING cowardice!

So the question remains... just what would these anonymous "experts" agree with Kevin on? Or disagree with me on?

Can you show that they knew what I know, and THEN cite their "expert" opinion?

Dale Hayes Wrote:Only a colossal jewel of ignorance would place more veracity and credibility on emergency room doctors than these experts.

Oh, I don't think most people would accept your proposal that anonymous so called "experts" know better than the first hand eyewitnesses insofar as what those witnesses saw and heard.

They are FORCED to rely on those very people.

Are there any believers who'd like to defend the nonsense that Dale writes about these mythical "20 Forensic Experts?"