[Ben Holmes]

(09-26-2016, 04:18 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:You'd know far better than most that such would not apply to me... don't you Patrick?

Oh absolutely Ben, how could I disagree - you have an excellent good knowledge of the assassination - it is a shame that you process the information that you have in such a illogical manner.

And yet, you'll absolutely REFUSE to provide even a single example of my "illogical" processing of information... because you're again not telling the truth. You can't provide an example.

Oh, you'll explain that it's beneath you, or you're too busy, or you don't care, or any other number of explanations for why you refuse to support your claim... but the truth is, you can't.
 

(09-26-2016, 04:18 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:And yet, the truth is, you've rather consistently lied about the evidence

Absolute nonsense!

Yet you refuse to refute it when I point it out. Such as your claim that Dr. Baden was correct, WHEN YOU CONTRADICTED DR. BADEN YOURSELF.

Anytime I get specific on the evidence, you run.

Why is that, Patrick? Would you like some examples?
 

(09-26-2016, 04:18 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:and you've been caught every time you do so. (I don't believe I've missed any of your lies...)

Complete BS.

Then simply quote me where I made the claim that "It is s shame in some respects that people like Ben Holmes give many of the well intentioned pro conspiracy supporters a bad name with his 7 shot, 5 shooter scenario with mobile film lab and metal detector team for all those missed bullets....."
 
That's a provable lie on your part.

You can't support such a lie... so you simply keep pretending that you never said it.
 

(09-26-2016, 04:18 PM)Patrick C Wrote:   

Ben Holmes Wrote:You've not retracted even a single lie I've pointed out.

There is nothing to retract!

One lie was quoted above.

Another one would be your claim that Dr. Baden was correct when stated that "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said."

I can keep this up all day long... merely by going through the posts that you've refused to answer.

So this would be another example of a lie... you know that there's things you should retract, but you refuse to... then claim that "there is nothing to retract"

You have my permission now to begin running again, Patrick.

Because both of us know you'll never address the two lies referenced above, let alone all the rest of them...