[Ben Holmes]

(10-07-2016, 04:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:Believers in this forum have NO explanation for these facts... none whatsoever.

Absolute tripe. This case was investigated so thoroughly that many minor lines of investigation would have been left out of the final supporting volumes.

How many do you want 36 volumes...?

In the real world, mistakes are made and things get overlooked and no doubt to cover their backs, the FBI may well have pushed a few things under the carpet, a bit like the CIA did with the Castro plots.

Politics is ripe with intrigue and deception - nothing new there.

Get real. Non of this means Oswald was set up.

They should have been watching Oswald, he was a risk. No wonder Hoover covered his back and his beloved FBI. They messed up. So did the SS and DPD - they should have clocked that rifle at shot one - or before. But mistakes happen and so do assassinations.

You'll notice that Patrick did EXACTLY as I predicted... he refused to explain these facts... and in keeping with his past history, is indeed a coward.

The fact that Stombaugh, and expert in this very topic, examined the front of the shirt, and made a report which disappeared, makes it ENTIRELY CREDIBLE that what he reported was that the "hole" (actually a slit) was caused by a scalpel, and not a bullet.

This possibility fits in with other evidence, and fails to support the mythical "SBT" - and explains why the report disappeared.

This isn't "minor" evidence at all.

Indeed, had Stombaugh found bullet fragments in a clearly bullet caused hole - it's simply not possible to believe that a report saying this would be considered a merely minor detail, and conceivably left out of the report and it's 26 volumes.

Yet this is what Patrick wants everyone to believe.

Rather silly, actually!