[Ben Holmes]

(10-17-2016, 05:41 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:The "gesture" he made referred to the wounds that were reported to him. He gives the source that told him where the wounds were located.

Patrick will ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to admit who this source was...

Watch!

He says he has a call from Dr Perry. At no point does he say he was told WHERE the shots came from. And he states the shots came from the rear. 

No wonder you have such a ridiculous view on the case. You can't understand English.

Remember folks, I PREDICTED IT!!!

Patrick has come out with an outright lie.

I invite Patrick to go to the 2:39 mark on this video:





Then tell us again just who gave Kilduff his information about the head wound...

We HAVE debated this before, and you lied before on this issue. It's truly amusing to watch believers twist and turn and outright lie on this issue...
 

(10-17-2016, 05:41 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Kilduff states he heard no shots from the front and he says nothing about being told ANYTHING to the contrary.

Make stuff up all you like Ben, but understand it speaks volumes about your take on this open and shut case.

Indeed, it's YOU that's making things up. I can cite for my statements... you cannot.
 

---

 

(10-17-2016, 05:41 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  It was interesting to hear Mac Kilduff say he thought Oswald was after Connally, maybe the fatal head shot was aimed at Connally as he fell left and poor old JFK got in the way.....it is possible and a lot more likely than your 7 shot 5 shooter scenario.....

Who cares?

Speculation is just speculation... But lies are outright lies.

WHO DID MALCOLM KILDUFF STATE GAVE HIM THE LOCATION OF JFK'S WOUNDS???

And why did you lie about it?