[Ben Holmes]

(12-05-2016, 04:53 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(12-04-2016, 08:06 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(12-04-2016, 05:05 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:It wasn't, of course, "right by Oswald's rooming house". It was more than a block away, and the guy who got out of the cab starting walking South... Oswald's apt was North. Go ahead, Patrick, deny any of these details...

Not denying that it was a block away, but sorry in a city the size of Dallas FW - a block is right by in my book.

Yep... couldn't deny the truth.

Which means that you were trying to mislead people, weren't you Patrick?
 

(12-04-2016, 05:05 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:And explain why you claimed to have answered the only question raised in the head wound thread, then pretended to be surprised that I was referring to the only question in that post...

Speak English Ben, please.

You can keep running like the coward you are, Patrick...

I asked you to give the medical terminology that would be used if one presumed that there was a wound on the back of the head.

You claimed you'd already answered the question - yet had not...

Then you finally DID answer the question after I pointed out that you were lying...

Now you refuse to retract your lies...

Or respond to the post.

Quite the coward, aren't you Patrick? (And trying to cover up by pretending not to understand plain English...)

And for anyone interested in proof of Patrick's cowardice, here it is.
 

(12-04-2016, 05:05 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:Or run again. Who cares???

I don't care a jot about your views on the assassination Ben, I drop in this thread for amusement for maybe 20 minutes per week.

And take a rather thorough thrashing each time... All I need to do is point out each time when you blatantly lie.

Or when you quite cowardly refuse to address the issues I raise... such as who Darryl Click or David Edmond Knapp are...
 

(12-04-2016, 05:05 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Seems like no one else seems to drop in now - I wonder why that is....maybe something to do with your irrational, illogical style...and that is being polite by the way.

Believers have been running away from debating me for over a decade... it's nothing new.

Nor is it only me... you cannot point to a SINGLE example of a believer going head to head against someone reasonably knowledgeable on the evidence.

If it were only my "irrational illogical style" - then you'd certainly be able to point to real debates happening somewhere... but you can't.

You're merely lying again.

For example, what's "irrational" or "illogical" about bringing up Darryl Click or David Edmond Knapp?

Or pointing out your cowardice in refusing debate?

Oh what a surprise....."Lying" and "Cowardice" again. YAWN !!!
 

Ben Holmes Wrote:You cannot point to a SINGLE example of a believer going head to head against someone reasonably knowledgeable on the evidence.

What a howler......how about the two years going head to head on a weekly basis with Hank, SVA and myslef Benny Boy and DVP from time to time...?

You don't half talk a load of tripe.

And as for "real debates" - you don't know the meaning of the word.....!

Point to a single "debate" where Henry, SVA, or yourself didn't run away... AND CITE FOR IT.

But you won't be able to. You and other believers end up running away all the time. Even this post illustrates your abject cowardice... I keep trying to get you to respond to Darryl Click or David Edmond Knapp, and all anyone sees is your cowardice...

Run Patrick... RUN!!!