[Patrick C]

(01-17-2017, 03:44 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

David Emerling Wrote:The Single Bullet Theory is quite simple. There are no competing theories that stand up to the evidence in nearly the same way. The Single Bullet Theory has all the hallmarks or rising to the level of a fact.

If this were actually true - believers wouldn't be afraid of debate on this issue.

I challenge any and all believers to state just what refutes the explanation that there were multiple shooters...

[Crickets...]

An excellent post from David Emmerling I must say.

It  has been many weeks since I looked at this Ben Holmes site, since I am not a fan of JFK Groundhog Day......

David provides a fine summary

"For instance, I accept the "Single Bullet Theory" as a FACT because it conforms quite nicely with all aspects of the Baloney Test. Alternate theories that account for all of Kennedy's and Connally's wounds fail miserably in many categories. Yet, those wounds DO exist. It happened. There MUST be an explanation. There cannot be numerous explanations. As Dale Myers says quite succinctly, "You can talk about all the theories you want. This thing happened only ONE way ... it's not a magic bullet at all. It's not even a single bullet theory, in my opinion. It's a single bullet FACT."......"

It certainly did happen only one way and the SBT is indeed the most sensible, plasusible and likely scenario for what happened in respect of the non fatal wounds of JFK and JC. We cannot prove it, but know it is nigh on a fact.

Message to Holmes......Hey Benny, I see you are getting lots of interesting comments.......not....I wonder why that is....?