[Ben Holmes]

(02-08-2017, 03:48 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(01-17-2017, 03:26 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

Anonymous Believer Wrote:No, the SBT is NOT a proven fact. It is simply the only plausible explanation for the JFK's upper body wound and all of JBC's wounds that has ever been offered. It wins by default. 

This is a quite despicable lie.

The "plausible explanation" was known within minutes of the assassination - there were multiple shooters.

Is there anyone in America that isn't familiar with this "plausible explanation?"

The anon believer is not technically correct. It is remotely possible that JFK showed a visible delayed reaction and JC was struck by a seperate bullet fired by Oswald 1.7 seconds later. It is however a REMOTE possibility because one of the bullets needs to have disappeared.

You're quite the despicable liar, aren't you, Patrick?

I've pointed out many times the speed of cycled fire recorded by the FBI for CE-139. You KNOW FOR A FACT that it can't be fired as quickly as 1.7 seconds.

(02-08-2017, 03:48 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  The SBT though is of coure THE MOST PLAUSIBLE scenario by a country mile.

No, it isn't. It fails to explain the known evidence.

(02-08-2017, 03:48 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(01-17-2017, 03:26 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  The "plausible explanation" was known within minutes of the assassination - there were multiple shooters.

Twidle Twaddle, people had NO IDEA there were multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza - other than the handful who thought shots came from 2 directions.

You refute yourself.

(02-08-2017, 03:48 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Of the hundreds who heard the shots, they thought they came from one gunman. They were right of course. They just did not all get the location correct - perfectly understandable.

Nope.

Your speculation isn't evidence.