[Ben Holmes]

(03-21-2017, 08:13 PM)Hollywood Wrote:  No depository employees other than Oswald left identifiable prints on the sniper's nest boxes even though none of them wore gloves.

I quite doubt if moving boxes was considered a task that took all the employees in the building.

I rather expect that few, if any boxes, would have prints from multiple people.

But this one did... and considering the location - the presumed 'Sniper's Nest' - it's downright incredible that the unknown prints were not identified.

Now, I don't know this for a fact - but I've never yet seen any testimony from any warehouse employee stating that their fingerprints were taken by the DPD.

If this is true, that no-one's fingerprints were taken to compare with the unknown prints on the box, then this merely goes to show the frameup that was in process.
 

(03-21-2017, 08:13 PM)Hollywood Wrote:  Roy Truly testified that the two, small, lightweight cartons marked "Rolling Readers" found at the sixth floor window were ordinarily stored "40 feet away or so". William Shelley, the Depository foreman, testified that the Rolling Readers cartons were normally stored "at least halfway across the building from the corner window.

When Shelley was asked if it would have been unusual for the two Rolling Readers cartons to be out of the stack and over by the window he replied that it would have been very unusual because they were different size cartons from any other boxes on that floor. They were smaller boxes. He stated that the fact that they were even over by the window suggests that they were moved by someone familiar with the different size cartons available on the sixth floor but also knew where to find them - in other words a Depository Employee.

This is beyond silly.

Does it really require an employee to see the sizes of the boxes?



I'm not an employee of the Texas School Book Depository, but I don't see the problem... my eyesight seems perfectly suited to finding boxes of an appropriate size.

Left as a presumption ... that the boxes were moved that day, and hadn't been there for several days...

 

(03-21-2017, 08:13 PM)Hollywood Wrote:  Maybe an employee whose prints were found in the sniper's nest. Interesting that Mr. Holmes left these pesky details out.

Or perhaps by the person who left the unknown prints on the box.

It would not have been unusual for any of the warehouse employees prints to be on the boxes they handled daily in their job - but it is downright strange that a print that could not be identified was found there.

Nor did I "leave out" that detail - the post STARTS with the fact that Oswald's prints were found on the box.

Our new anonymous "Hollywood" somehow missed giving any explanation...

Would you like to try again, and show ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that the DPD or FBI attempted to actually investigate the prints found on the box?