[Nick Principe]

(03-23-2017, 07:08 PM)Hollywood Wrote:  Prints from an unidentified nonemployee cannot be considered in conjunction with the other several pieces of evidence that DO indicate Oswald's guilt.

The only way they can't be considered is if the investigation was running under the mandate that Oswald was the lone assassin, and that he did not have any "confederates." So, Mr. Katzenbach, now that we've established you're assuming what you need to prove, do you wish to regurgitate the mistake of daring to bring up "critical mass", and how epically BAD it works against you when all the evidence and witness testimony really comes into play?