[Hollywood]

Oswald not reading the paper, not packing a lunch, etc. are INDICATIONS of behavior consistent with a person contemplating an extraordinary act. The other items in Bugliosi's list, which I notice you avoid, are STRONG pieces of evidence which prove Oswald's obvious guilt. Notice the 53 items on the list include many different, varied TYPES of evidence - to honest people without an agenda, the inescapable conclusion is indisputable.

Does Mr. Holmes have ANYTHING on a par with ballistic evidence including bullet fragments, the murder weapon itself, etc.? Not even close - and you know it. How about an eyewitness to an actual GUNMAN on the GK, instead of hearsay evidence and innuendo from people offered after the fact, many times many years after the fact? When you place Bugliosi's list along side the flimsy nonsense in conspiracy books, it's embarrassing to see the distinction between the two.