Hello There, Guest!
View New Posts   View Today's Posts
Historical Fact? NOT!!!

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


02-13-2017, 06:18 PM #1
Ben Holmes
Administrator
*******
Posts: 950 Threads:276 Joined: May 2016 Reputation: 34 Stance Critic

Historical Fact? NOT!!!
Boz Wrote:It is an historical fact that Oswald shot and killed Kennedy.  It is a waste of time debating a fact. It's like debating whether 2 plus 1 equals three. 

This amusing admission was posted on John McAdam's censored forum.

Believers simply cannot debate the "facts" in this case - the evidence doesn't support their "facts".

So they simply assert that it's a "waste of time" - when in fact, it has nothing to do with wasting time, it has to do with the fact that believers CANNOT defend the Warren Commission without ad hominem and outright lying.

Such as Patrick Collins repeated assertion that the majority of witnesses documented IN PRINT in the first two days pointed, not to the Grassy Knoll, but to the TSBD.

Yet he continues to refuse to cite for that "fact"... what does that tell the intelligent lurker?

02-14-2017, 01:10 AM #2
Patrick C
Senior Member
****
Posts: 450 Threads:11 Joined: May 2016 Reputation: 0 Stance WCR Supporter

RE: Historical Fact? NOT!!!
Waiting for YOU to post all the GK in print supporters v all the TSBD in print supporters Ben from the weekend of 22/23 Nov 63....

Mind you it really matters not. The medical report tells us where the shots came from. All we are disputing is whether there was a missed shot from the GK and a conspiracy or not.......

There is no evidence of a frontal shot in the medical examination.
This post was last modified: 02-14-2017, 02:03 AM by Ben Holmes.

02-14-2017, 02:03 AM #3
Ben Holmes
Administrator
*******
Posts: 950 Threads:276 Joined: May 2016 Reputation: 34 Stance Critic

RE: Historical Fact? NOT!!!
(02-14-2017, 01:10 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Waiting for YOU to post all the GK in print supporters v all the TSBD in print supporters Ben from the weekend of 22/23 Nov 63....

Mind you it really matters not. The medical report tells us where the shots came from. All we are disputing is whether there was a missed shot from the GK and a conspiracy or not.......


No Patrick, what we're doing is proving that you are a liar when it comes to the evidence in this case.

EVERY SINGLE SHOT COULD HAVE BEEN FILMED AND WITNESSED BY HUNDREDS OF WITNESSES, AND DEFINITIVELY KNOWN BEYOND ANY DISPUTE TO HAVE COME FROM ONLY THE SNIPERS NEST IN THE TSBD - and this would have no bearing whatsoever on what the majority of the witnesses, documented in the first two days... stated.

So repeat your assertion of what the majority of witnesses, documented in the first two days - stated as the source of the shots, and I'll post my list, fully cited. 

Or evade the question again...

(02-14-2017, 01:10 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  There is no evidence of a frontal shot in the medical examination.

There was NO "examination" of the throat wound during the autopsy... so this is a very disingenuous statement, isn't it?

The real question would be: "Did the initial doctors who saw the wound believe it to have all the characteristics of an entry wound?"

The answer, quite clearly, is yes.

So there is indeed evidence of a frontal shot.

P.S. In the future, any posts that don't use any poster's correct name will be deleted in full.
This post was last modified: 02-14-2017, 02:07 AM by Ben Holmes.







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)