[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:Astonishing" is an understatement... there's absolutely no explanation possible from believers, and you've offered none.

How could I offer an explanation - I did not work on the commission and I do not know anyone who did and I do not recall reading about why specifically Chaney was not cold. I can but hazard a guess....but guessing on this would be pointless.

You clearly can't tell the difference between offering an opinon, which is all an "explanation" is - and offering historical fact that has been testified to or written about.

And, of course, you prove my statement correct... as I stated, there's absolutely no explanation possible from believers... and you've offered none.

When trying to define history - you cannot do experiments... you cannot go back in time and watch it unfold... you can only offer explanations... and when you have competing explanations - the one that most easily explains the evidence & facts - clearly wins.

The testifying eyewitnesses to the Warren Commission - both the ones who did testify, and the ones not called to testify, is completely inexplicable on the basis of a belief in the WCR.

Calling someone who once knew someone who babysat a 2 year old Lee Harvey Oswald, yet refusing to call James Chaney is complete nonsense, and you know it, whether or not you're willing to publicly admit it.