[Ben Holmes]

(09-12-2016, 05:11 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  Dales quote of Baden is sensible. Baden gives a very persuasive reason for how the docs at Parkland got the wound location slightly wrong in their memory.

His "persuasive reason" is a lie.

Dr. Baden is claiming that the Autopsy Report didn't put the wound in the Parietal-Occipital region.

THAT'S A LIE.

(09-12-2016, 05:11 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  I am not sure what you mean by

Ben Holmes Wrote:Sorry Dale - but "parietal-occipital" matches quite nicely with "parietal-occipital"

because what YOU are really saying is that the wound was further back because it was caused by a frontal strike blowing out more of the occiptial bone and cerebellum........this is NOT what the autopsy concluded.

What's to understand?

Michael Baden said that "The head exit wound was not in the parietal-occipital area, as the Parkland doctors said. They were wrong."

Now, even YOU cannot claim that the Autopsy Report didn't put it in the Parietal-Occipital area - unless you're nitpicking the temporal.

Did Baden claim that the large wound was "was not in the parietal-occipital area?" (Unless you're dishonest, the answer is "yes")

Did the Autopsy report state that the large wound was in the parietal-occipital area? (Unless you're dishonest, the answer is "yes")

In case your memory fails you Patrick, here it is again:

Quote:1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.

Baden is flat wrong... and nothing you can do will save him.

His "persuasive reason" is a lie, and you know it to be a lie.

Don't you...?