(02-14-2017, 01:10 AM)Patrick C Wrote: Waiting for YOU to post all the GK in print supporters v all the TSBD in print supporters Ben from the weekend of 22/23 Nov 63....
Mind you it really matters not. The medical report tells us where the shots came from. All we are disputing is whether there was a missed shot from the GK and a conspiracy or not.......
No Patrick, what we're doing is proving that
you are a liar when it comes to the evidence in this case.
EVERY SINGLE SHOT COULD HAVE BEEN FILMED AND WITNESSED BY HUNDREDS OF WITNESSES, AND
DEFINITIVELY KNOWN BEYOND ANY DISPUTE TO HAVE COME FROM ONLY THE SNIPERS NEST IN THE TSBD - and this would have no bearing whatsoever on what the majority of the witnesses, documented in the first two days... stated.
So repeat your assertion of what the majority of witnesses, documented in the first two days - stated as the source of the shots, and I'll post my list, fully cited.
Or evade the question again...
(02-14-2017, 01:10 AM)Patrick C Wrote: There is no evidence of a frontal shot in the medical examination.
There was
NO "examination" of the throat wound during the autopsy... so this is a very disingenuous statement, isn't it?
The real question would be: "Did the initial doctors who saw the wound believe it to have all the characteristics of an entry wound?"
The answer, quite clearly, is yes.
So there is indeed evidence of a frontal shot.
P.S. In the future, any posts that don't use any poster's correct name will be deleted in full.
This post was last modified: 02-14-2017, 02:07 AM by
Ben Holmes.