[Ben Holmes]

Patrick C Wrote:Who cares whether there was a roll call or not....

Maybe the warehouse guys were assembled, maybe the office workers were not......maybe Truly and Shelly did an informal roll call.

I would be astonished if Oswald was the only person who did not stay at work and have never believed it.

And your point is what Holmes?

That you want to continue with your obsession with calling people liars if they have a different view to you?

No Patrick... this is not a matter of "opinion".

It's IMPOSSIBLE for there to have been a "roll-call" in which only Oswald was missing. Absolutely impossible.

No-one can reconcile the known evidence to make this even vaguely possible - yet believers continue to make such statements, and refuse to address the evidence on this topic.

The "point" has once again been made quite well... believers simply cannot follow the real evidence - notice that even you admit that that I'm absolutely correct on the issue of a mythical roll-call with only Oswald missing - YET YOU STILL TRY TO DEFINE IT AS MERE OPINION.

I'm sure you know that it's not.

And I will correctly label anyone making claims for this mythical roll-call as a liar. It's not a matter of opinion.

And, as I stated:

Ben Holmes Wrote:It's quite cowardly of David to fail to note that the EARLIEST testimony & statements prove beyond all doubt that this cannot be true. So he pulls a statement from many years later to try to refute the fact that there were many people missing from the TSBD in the afternoon.

He's clearly still trying to save the mythical "roll-call" from it's well-deserved burial. David Von Pein is a coward... as well as a liar by implication. When you post evidence you KNOW to be untrue, and try to pass it off without noting that it's not true, you're lying. (The list of names & citations to their testimony has already been posted.)

Tell us Patrick - wouldn't you agree that someone posting evidence they KNOW to be untrue is a liar?