[Ben Holmes]

(11-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:If that's all you had ACTUALLY stated, you wouldn't be a liar.

But you made the claim that Perry was "his source on the head wound."....

I posted that according to Kilduff, in 1963 it was Burkley and in 1991 that it was Perry. That is all.

I quoted you above... so you're lying again, aren't you Patrick?

You tried to assert that Perry was the source for Kilduff's information on the head wound - but you can't quote Kilduff saying that.

You're a proven liar.

Quote Kilduff stating that Perry was the source of his information - AS GIVEN IN THE PRESS CONFERENCE - on JFK's wounds - or admit that you're a liar.

 

(11-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:And that's an outright lie.

No it is not - he states that it was Perry in the 1991 interview. DUH!!!

Then you should be able to quote him saying that he got his information about JFK's wounds for the press conference from Dr. Perry.

But when you FIRST mentioned this topic, you were honest enough to state that it was merely an implication.

Now you're claiming this "implication" to be a fact.

And STILL refuse to quote Kilduff's actual words.
 

(11-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:The CONTEMPORARY video states very explicitly that Dr. Burkley was the source. You and Henry have lied REPEATEDLY on this issue.

Yes absolutely on Nov 22 1963 around 130pm local time he states Burlkley told him it was bullet to the head or words to that effect.

And yet, both you and Henry have repeatedly lied about this.

And you refuse to explain why.