[Patrick C]

Ben Holmes Wrote:

(07-07-2016, 01:20 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Ok, well where is the evidence that some one else committed the murder.....you have been WOEFULLY short on that one Ben, other than you glib speculation of multiple shooters.....

Name people who saw some one fire from Daltex, County Records.......your south western Plaza spot.....come on, name them.....tell us about the other bullets...where are they...?

(6) On Friday morning, Oswald placed a long paper-wrapped package in the back seat of Frazier's car.

Until you can put a rifle in that package, it does *nothing* to indict Oswald.

I TOTALLY disagree. The fact that Oswald took a package to work on that day is highly suspicious and indicative of guilt. He owned a rifle, the rifle was missing from the blanket. His rifle was found in the 6th floor. He carried a package into work on that day of all others.....why?

Why would he make a special trip on the Thursday and not the Friday for curtain rods...? It is ridiculous...
 

Ben Holmes Wrote:It's also worth noting that every witness who saw that package, and testified about it, stated that it was too short to contain a rifle.

"every" - yeah right is that 3 people....?

So what, they were wrong about the length. Easily done.

Ben Holmes Wrote:Their testimony is quite compelling, because of the way that they stated Oswald had carried the package, with his palm under the package, and the top of the package was UNDER his armpit.

Again I totally disagree, I don't think it is compelling at all. The gun could easily have been held at an angle protruding out at the front of Oswald's arm pit and not visible from the rear.

And......I don't think for one moment Bugliosi is really saying that each single point is "proof" of Oswald's guilt. He is saying that there an awful lot of areas that point towards Oswald's guilt. Add them ALL up and you have a compelling case for guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case for Oswald's guilt is far stronger than the case for his innocence - by an order of magnitude. That you conspiracy campers here cannot see that is beyond comprehension - especially when you consider the depth of knowledge regarding the case that is evident.

I just wonder about the mind set that allows such a belief and I must conclude that something must be seriously wrong within the psyche of individuals with considerable knowledge of the case, who cannot even entertain the possibility that Oswald could have acted alone. It is nothing short of staggering.