[Ben Holmes]

(10-26-2016, 10:28 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Like I said yesterday I don't see any point in discussing this matter with some one who can't understand plain English and who is bereft of logical deduction ability.

In other words, you don't want to retract your original lie, and explain or support the lies you've been telling.

I can understand that.
 

(10-26-2016, 10:28 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  We are gulfs apart, we speak a different language and that should be plain for readers here to see. Your posts on the Kilduff matter are laughable and your interpretation of my very clear statement that it is Kilduff himself who cites two sources of infomation, is frankly astonishing.

You're LYING again, Patrick.

Even you admit that Kilduff's decades later interview only "implied" that Dr. Perry was the source of his information on the wounds...

Only by constantly pointing out your lies have I been able to get you to even ACKNOWLEDGE the original source of Malcolm Kilduff's information... but even then, EVEN AFTER CITING THE PROOF - you replied to that post still refusing to acknowledge the truth.

Now you pretend that the "implied" statement is equal to the contemporary direct statement by Kilduff. It's not.

Nor did you publicly stated that Dr. Burkley was the source that Malcolm Kilduff specified, EVEN AFTER MULTIPLE CORRECTIONS BY ME - until your lies just got too painful for you... THEN, and only then... did you finally admit the truth.

 

(10-26-2016, 10:28 AM)Patrick C Wrote:  Your ignorance on the manner of logical debate is positively Himalayan.

What "ignorance?"

You cannot quote any "ignorance" whatsoever... all you'll be able to quote is me citing the evidence, and pointing out that you're lying...

You cannot point to any requirement of "logical debate" that forbids me from pointing out your lies and cowardice.

Nor will you even try.