[Ben Holmes]

(11-04-2016, 06:41 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(10-31-2016, 08:29 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  

(10-31-2016, 05:19 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:It's amusing that Patrick couldn't defend or retract his blatant lie that Kilduff referenced Dr. Perry as the source of his statements about JFK's wounds.

I have linked you to a 1991 interview  with Kilduff in which he clearly states that Perry was his source on the head wound.

YOU'RE LYING AGAIN, PATRICK!!!

I defy you to post the EXACT WORDS he uses ...

You won't, of course - because he says no such thing.

Tell us Patrick, WHY DO YOU THINK YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH LYING IN THIS FORUM???
 

(10-31-2016, 05:19 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  It is that simple.

He states he confered with Perry just after 13;50 seconds in;-

[video=youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSpw9w5GGYk[/video]

So I am afraid you have either missed that or are deliberately ignoring it in whcih case callin me the liar just makes you look frankly bonkers.

Are you mad...?

The fact that you've just been nailed blatantly lying will be PROVEN when you absolutely REFUSE to quote Kilduff's words where he said that Perry was "his source on the head wound."

You'll admit just who's "mad" when you follow up this post without quoting Kilduff's exact words...

Remember folks - I predicted it in advance!!!

You state

Ben Holmes Wrote:The fact that you've just been nailed blatantly lying will be PROVEN when you absolutely REFUSE to quote Kilduff's words where he said that Perry was "his source on the head wound."

I posted

He states he confered with Perry just after 13;50 seconds in his 1991 interview.

You have ears - why do you need me to write it down.

It is a good post though because it shows just what an uneducated, insignificant and juvenile poster you are. Of course Kilduff states he got his info from Perry. That is what he said. There is no denying it.

That you think that I have not scripted the words makes me a liar is simply ridiculous.

[Ad hominem deleted by Forum Administrator]

Yep... a proven liar.

You cannot quote Kilduff's words, BECAUSE HE NEVER STATED THAT PERRY WAS "HIS SOURCE ON THE HEAD WOUND."

Indeed, the very first time you brought this up, you even used the word "implied" with reference to this topic, knowing that Kilduff could only be said to IMPLY that Perry was the source of his information on the head wound.

You were at least marginally honest then... now you're blatantly lying.

Now you've been caught lying - and you can't get around it. (Although it's clear you tried, by subtly changing what you stated.)

And when your lie is pointed out, you simply double down on your lie... and refuse to retract or correct it.

Yet you can't quote Kilduff saying it.

Why is that, Patrick?

[Patrick C]

(10-25-2016, 01:36 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Patrick has repeatedly claimed that Malcolm Kilduff got his information about JFK's wounds from Dr. Perry... despite the fact that WHEN HE DESCRIBED THOSE WOUNDS, he also said who he got the information from.

Here it is again, at the 2:39 mark:





Despite the fact that Patrick has seen this video many times - he's still willing to lie about it.

Why the lies, Patrick???

What do you think it gains you?

Why is it so impossible for either you or Henry Sienzant to publicly state that Kilduff got his information from Dr. Burkley???

And if you'll lie about something so easily checked, how can anyone trust anything you say on things that are more difficult to validate?

I will try one more time to explain to you that Kilduff makes it quite clear it was Dr  Burkley he got his report from. However in 1991he said it was Dr Perry who told him it was a bullet wound to the head that killed JFK.

I have stated little more than that - other than in fact it does not matter who told him.

That you want to make something out of nothing just illustrates what a fool you are. You can't even understand plain Englsih - but then we have known that for years. No wonder you are considered such a goon in the pro conpsiracy world resident on the web.

[Ben Holmes]

(11-07-2016, 02:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(10-25-2016, 01:36 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Patrick has repeatedly claimed that Malcolm Kilduff got his information about JFK's wounds from Dr. Perry... despite the fact that WHEN HE DESCRIBED THOSE WOUNDS, he also said who he got the information from.

Here it is again, at the 2:39 mark:





Despite the fact that Patrick has seen this video many times - he's still willing to lie about it.

Why the lies, Patrick???

What do you think it gains you?

Why is it so impossible for either you or Henry Sienzant to publicly state that Kilduff got his information from Dr. Burkley???

And if you'll lie about something so easily checked, how can anyone trust anything you say on things that are more difficult to validate?

I will try one more time to explain to you that Kilduff makes it quite clear it was Dr  Burkley he got his report from. However in 1991he said it was Dr Perry who told him it was a bullet wound to the head that killed JFK.

I have stated little more than that - other than in fact it does not matter who told him.

That you want to make something out of nothing just illustrates what a fool you are. You can't even understand plain Englsih - but then we have known that for years. No wonder you are considered such a goon in the pro conpsiracy world resident on the web.

If that's all you had ACTUALLY stated, you wouldn't be a liar.

But you made the claim that Perry was "his source on the head wound."

And that's an outright lie.

The CONTEMPORARY video states very explicitly that Dr. Burkley was the source. You and Henry have lied REPEATEDLY on this issue.

Why is this such a contentious issue?

[Patrick C]

Ben Holmes Wrote:If that's all you had ACTUALLY stated, you wouldn't be a liar.

But you made the claim that Perry was "his source on the head wound."....

I posted that according to Kilduff, in 1963 it was Burkley and in 1991 that it was Perry. That is all.

Ben Holmes Wrote:And that's an outright lie.

No it is not - he states that it was Perry in the 1991 interview. DUH!!!

Ben Holmes Wrote:The CONTEMPORARY video states very explicitly that Dr. Burkley was the source. You and Henry have lied REPEATEDLY on this issue.

Yes absolutely on Nov 22 1963 around 130pm local time he states Burlkley told him it was bullet to the head or words to that effect.

[Ad Hominem deleted by Forum Administrator]

Pip Pip

[Ben Holmes]

(11-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:If that's all you had ACTUALLY stated, you wouldn't be a liar.

But you made the claim that Perry was "his source on the head wound."....

I posted that according to Kilduff, in 1963 it was Burkley and in 1991 that it was Perry. That is all.

I quoted you above... so you're lying again, aren't you Patrick?

You tried to assert that Perry was the source for Kilduff's information on the head wound - but you can't quote Kilduff saying that.

You're a proven liar.

Quote Kilduff stating that Perry was the source of his information - AS GIVEN IN THE PRESS CONFERENCE - on JFK's wounds - or admit that you're a liar.

 

(11-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:And that's an outright lie.

No it is not - he states that it was Perry in the 1991 interview. DUH!!!

Then you should be able to quote him saying that he got his information about JFK's wounds for the press conference from Dr. Perry.

But when you FIRST mentioned this topic, you were honest enough to state that it was merely an implication.

Now you're claiming this "implication" to be a fact.

And STILL refuse to quote Kilduff's actual words.
 

(11-07-2016, 05:20 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

Ben Holmes Wrote:The CONTEMPORARY video states very explicitly that Dr. Burkley was the source. You and Henry have lied REPEATEDLY on this issue.

Yes absolutely on Nov 22 1963 around 130pm local time he states Burlkley told him it was bullet to the head or words to that effect.

And yet, both you and Henry have repeatedly lied about this.

And you refuse to explain why.