[Ben Holmes]

(11-07-2016, 02:30 PM)Patrick C Wrote:  

(10-25-2016, 01:36 PM)Ben Holmes Wrote:  Patrick has repeatedly claimed that Malcolm Kilduff got his information about JFK's wounds from Dr. Perry... despite the fact that WHEN HE DESCRIBED THOSE WOUNDS, he also said who he got the information from.

Here it is again, at the 2:39 mark:





Despite the fact that Patrick has seen this video many times - he's still willing to lie about it.

Why the lies, Patrick???

What do you think it gains you?

Why is it so impossible for either you or Henry Sienzant to publicly state that Kilduff got his information from Dr. Burkley???

And if you'll lie about something so easily checked, how can anyone trust anything you say on things that are more difficult to validate?

I will try one more time to explain to you that Kilduff makes it quite clear it was Dr  Burkley he got his report from. However in 1991he said it was Dr Perry who told him it was a bullet wound to the head that killed JFK.

I have stated little more than that - other than in fact it does not matter who told him.

That you want to make something out of nothing just illustrates what a fool you are. You can't even understand plain Englsih - but then we have known that for years. No wonder you are considered such a goon in the pro conpsiracy world resident on the web.

If that's all you had ACTUALLY stated, you wouldn't be a liar.

But you made the claim that Perry was "his source on the head wound."

And that's an outright lie.

The CONTEMPORARY video states very explicitly that Dr. Burkley was the source. You and Henry have lied REPEATEDLY on this issue.

Why is this such a contentious issue?