Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
Re: LN Factoids
The idea that all the employees were marched back into the TSBD and there was a "roll call" is pretty silly given that the DPD were all over the building and had sealed it off to the public and most reporters.
Some employees were allowed back to collect belongings as I recall from my trips to Dallas way back in the 80s. Can't cite for that however.
Posts: 83
Threads:6
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance Critic
Re: LN Factoids
That's correct, Patrick C. .... I was allowed back to get my package of curtain rods, but they were gone.
Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
Re: LN Factoids
Ben,
People who support the WC conclusion are not beyond criticism. Neither are they necessarily well informed.
I do not lump all the pro LN folks in the same bucket, neither the pro C supporters.
I have always had reservations that we know the truth, but as the facts stand, IMO Oswald shot JFK alone.
It is bemusing to me that it seems NONE of you pro C stalwarts have ever stated, "well maybe Oswald did shoot JFK.....alone." You cannot entertain the possibility!
It was gratifying to me some years ago on a long discussion with Martin Hay, friend and foe on JFK when he said to me - "maybe Oswald did shoot JFK ...alone, I just don't think he did"
I think if you guys were a little more "open" ....discussion might be more interesting. Otherwise it seems here, like on Amazon it will be just groundhog day, beating ones head against a brick wall, never budging an inch.
YOUR views on the shooting - as in timings and accuracy for example ASTONISH me.....as an ex marine that you think Oswald could NOT have got off two shots in 5 to 6 seconds at those distances and got lucky....beggars belief. Truly.
Posts: 59
Threads:13
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
1
Stance Critic
Re: LN Factoids
It is bemusing to me that you don't believe in Santa Claus, Patrick. Truly. Not that one HAS to believe in Santa Claus, but you cannot even entertain the possibility! Look in the 6th floor parlour on Christmas Day (if you live on the sixth floor). The cookies are eaten. The milk is drunk. There are presents in the stockings. This is all hard evidence that he was there. Millions of eyewitnesses can attest to his existence. I think if you were a little more "open" to the idea, the discussion might be more interesting.
Or perhaps over the years you've come to examine all the hard evidence of his existence, and encountered problem after problem after problem with the legitimacy of that evidence. Like how can Santa be in one place at 1:15 a.m. when he was miles away just a few minutes prior? How does Santa run up and down the staircases of these houses without ever being seen and ever being out of breath? And of course, despite the "official" story, we KNOW he can't fit down a chimney.
Again, I think if you were a little more "open" and stepped back to analyze the hard evidence in any serious way, rather than from the perspective of, "It's possible, and that's all I care about" - [P. Collins, Aug. 31, 2015] then you might come to understand it is a fruitless endeavor to try and shoehorn the possibility of Santa's existence, into a place where the evidence just does not fit.
It was gratifying to me when the mother from Miracle on 34th Street said "maybe there is a Santa Clause...I just don't think there is." Yet so many people believe it to be so, and it just beggars belief. Truly.
Posts: 450
Threads:11
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
0
Stance WCR Supporter
Re: LN Factoids
My photographic memory failed me Garry on that you had once been a pro lone gunman supporter....
Did I recommend Posner....? I typically avoid recommending VB and Postner and suggest Peter Knight, Mike Majerus, Stephen White, Mel Ayton and Albert Newman...oh yes and Jean Davison of course.